DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
TAL .
Docket No: 5680-14/
12192-09
25 September 2014
This is in reference to your reconsideration request dated
8 April 2014 with enclosures. You previously petitioned the
Board and were advised in our letter of 19 August 2010, that
your application. had been denied.
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three-
member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered
by the Board consisted of your application, any material
submitted in support of your application, and prior case file.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board determined the medical notes you submitted, ©
even though not previously considered by the Board, were
insufficient to establish the existence of material error or
injustice. The Board determined the medical notes you provided
were not enough to outweigh the significant misconduct you
committed while on active duty. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel wiil be furnished upon request.
It is regrettable that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence within one year from the date of the Board's
decision. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by
the Board prior to making its decision in your case. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of
regularity attaches to all official record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or
injustice.
Sincerely, _.
ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3162 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board determined the psychological evaluation notes you submitted, even though not previously considered by the Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5598 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and your previous case file. Consequently, when _applying for a correction of an official record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9945 14
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 4 September 2014, a copy of which is attached. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8586 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying tor a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6136 14
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 17 December 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your letters, any material submitted in support of your application, and your prior case file. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire recoré, the Board determined your letter, even though not previously considered by the Board, was insufficient...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0669 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2014. However, the Board found those factors were insufficient to warrant any change in your reentry code, given your diagnosed condition, record of fraudulent entry and non- recommendation for retention. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5361 14_Redacted
Your current request has been carefully examined by a three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session on 8 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, any material submitted in support of your application, and prior case Eile. After careful and conscientious consideration of the enti record, the Board determined the letter from the Depart Veterans Affairs stating you are being treated for s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1804 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2014. Because your record does not contain the documentation regarding your discharge, the Board presumed regularity and thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0172 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. On 16 May 1969, you were again convicted by SPCM for two instances of UA from your unit totaling a period of 12 days and failure to go to your appointed place of duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR172 14_Redacted
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted’ of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 16 May 1969, you were again convicted by SPCM for two instances of UA from your unit totaling a period of 12 days and failure to go to...